A logical debunking of a debunking, as Brian Brown at the Bigfoot Show points out: if this guy hoaxed the original, then why does he need 21st Century tech to pull off something that's obviously way cheaper looking than P/G? For my money, that crappy bit of film still holds up after all this time. If it is a hoax, it is a damn good one. Because every time they trot out one of these look-how-easy-it-is, they just make it glaringly obvious that it ain't.
READ MORE HERE
2 comments:
After 40 years, the debate on this film continues with no end in sight.
It was,of course,only that much harder to do this 40 years ago...
CGI aside-
synthetics,cosmetics
and special effects have come
a loooong way since then.
Post a Comment